Hmmmm... with half-lidded smirk. So who, or what, is Mr. Geitner ..exactly. "Exactly" may never be known. Mr. Geitner, according to some,is best simulated as something sloozing from under yon rock.
PerchedEye sees the whole matter as a truth revealed: Wall Street's nature is to smell the easiest path to the money...screw elegant, long lifed systems approaches. "Give me the $, now and let's get with it."
The point? Geitner's toxic asset purchase plan, the Public-Private Investment Program (PPIP), will probably work since it promises a most juicy bait to attract Wall Street to end its hibernation and come forth for spring feeding.
Showing posts with label bailout. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bailout. Show all posts
Monday, March 23, 2009
Friday, March 20, 2009
Mr. Geitner is Crowned, and the Regicide is On
After a good lunch, I have it all figured out - Mr. Geitner is the fall guy. Not the scapegoat, note well, but the fall guy - the deception, the red herring. This is a grand, high drama, shell game...and everyone is about to fall for it. Geitner gets fired, everyone is satisfied that somebody got punished, move on to something else, and the fix is in. A trillion doled out, maybe more.
What is the NUB of all this? A clue: systemic dysfunction of Wall Street - insufficient regulation, excessive compensation of executives, personal hubris.
But Wall Street's illness can be catching...or, better, persuasive. As E. Robinson writes in TruthDig (Mar 19, '09)
What is the NUB of all this? A clue: systemic dysfunction of Wall Street - insufficient regulation, excessive compensation of executives, personal hubris.
But Wall Street's illness can be catching...or, better, persuasive. As E. Robinson writes in TruthDig (Mar 19, '09)
"...[what] Geithner doesn’t seem to understand, though, is how and why appearances matter. There has been a steady flow of news indicating that Wall Street doesn’t realize that the Era of Excess is over,..."BTW, are the new regulatory policies drafted yet? Hope they haven't been forgotten in all the chills and thrills of the AIG-bonus thing.
Monday, March 16, 2009
The AIG Bonus Shell Game & The Ghost of Section 8: Paulson at Point, Geitner and Congress in the Dark:...and Something This Way Comes
We shouldn't be surprised by the AIG bonus issue oozing forth these days. Last September (Feb 6, 19 -this blog), Section 8 of Secretary Paulson's first TARP draft gave us a big tip off that something strange was afoot about the financial relief planned by the former administration: messiness of some kind was rumbling down the tube, a huge power-money grab was taking shape right before our eyes, and more than any of these frightful vibrations there was a pervading sense that a naked, blatant gaming was about to be perpetrated on everyone outside of the previous administration. All we had to do was buy into Section 8's outrageous set up. And there will more AIG-like shenanigans to come - secretive, outrageous money giveaways, and feigned innocence the perps didn't realize what they were about to do, or did, was wrong, distasteful or unconstitutional.
Section 8 of Secretary Paulsons ONE PAGE draft of TARP 1 was adventuresome to put it mildly because it proposed to give Mr. Paulson complete, unquestionned, personal power over all relief funds, with exclusive confidentiality. All this power was to be unchecked and unmonitored. This would be unprecedented and truly dangerous for the future of our constitutional principles of checks and balances.
Section 8 should have set off alarms that there was a panicked need TO HIDE SOMETHING BIG. Plus, Section 8 was a statement of the methods and intentions of those who wanted to do the hiding.
Big Question: how possibly could Mr. Paulson and his masters imagine the Section 8 scheme would work? Answer: imho, though Section 8 violated the most rudimentary principles of constitutional checks and balances, Section 8 is routine corporate CEO-ese - total, unquestionned power held and exercised by one person - and Paulson lost it he was so panicked about something; so, as a former CEO of Goldman Sachs, he gambled for a miracle - the possible miracle that the Congress, press, public and Obama team would swallow the Section 8 chocker.
Note: TARP 1 was A ONE PAGE draft! To disburse a trillion dollars, maybe more???!!
Although Section 8 did not survive, not many reacted with the outrage that should have been heard. Despite that Section 8 hinted at things to come.
Exactly who and what was behind Section 8's attempted cover up? That answer might come out...or it might not. Instead it might be swept somewhere to be ignored as the short attention span of media and public drift elsewhere.
Now there is messy confusion about AIG bonuses, timing of same, why the taxpayer should be expected to pay the bonuses; but even more...why don't the banks, CEOs, traders and whoever else understand something is not right about receiving bonuses in a year when their companies went broke. Hmmmmm. So I have some questions,
(first, the broad context is the common sense view that a broke business enterprise should be helpless and in a position, by definition, of being totally vulnerable to renegotiate with creditors and contractual obligations):
1 Did Secretary Paulson know details about AIG's financial trouble last June 2008, uncluding bonus contracts, recipients, amoiunts?
2 At the very least, as a former investment house CEO (Goldman Sachs), wasn't Secretary Paulson knowledgable in principle about bonuses before Sept 8, TARP 1 (and Section 8); and wasn't he therefore able to conceptualize the detailed nature of collateral obligations carried by the relief targets?
3 Was Section 8, of TARP 1, designed to prevent Congressional due diligence inquiry and prevent Congressional examination of all future bailout funds?
4. What was particularly at threat by revealing details to be hidden by Section 8, and subsequently de facto hidden in Tarp 1?
5. Didn't Mr. Geitner, a former Wall Streeter, foresee in detail the landscape of all this - what institutions, their in-house contractual obligations, etc? His prior WStreet experience and expertise was the reason he was appointed Treasury Secretary.
6. By virtue of his WStreet experience, couldn't Mr. Geitner have anticipated problem issues that he then could have springboarded into prepared positions, drafts etc to be used by the Obama team as they cam into power?
7. Did Mr. Geitner discuss Section 8 with anyone? Why did Section 8 disappear after Tarp 1?
8. Did Mr. Geitner discuss with Mr. Paulson the transmittal by verbal or written means, Paulson-Bush administration agreements, understandings and obligations with Wall Street and the Federal Reserve?
9. Did Mr. Paulson consider, or have, informal discussions with Congressional committees regarding the information or insights he had about the crisis?
10. Finally, was/is Congress savvy enough to have anticipate the gist of Section 8? If so, why was there not an issue made right then?
The implications seem dire re the Paulson legacy: Section 8, the ghost of Section 8, the AIG bonus mess, the continuation of shields erected between the TARP targets and Congress and the Obama team..... Whatever is to come, you bet it will look like the AIG bonus mess.
Section 8 of Secretary Paulsons ONE PAGE draft of TARP 1 was adventuresome to put it mildly because it proposed to give Mr. Paulson complete, unquestionned, personal power over all relief funds, with exclusive confidentiality. All this power was to be unchecked and unmonitored. This would be unprecedented and truly dangerous for the future of our constitutional principles of checks and balances.
Section 8 should have set off alarms that there was a panicked need TO HIDE SOMETHING BIG. Plus, Section 8 was a statement of the methods and intentions of those who wanted to do the hiding.
Big Question: how possibly could Mr. Paulson and his masters imagine the Section 8 scheme would work? Answer: imho, though Section 8 violated the most rudimentary principles of constitutional checks and balances, Section 8 is routine corporate CEO-ese - total, unquestionned power held and exercised by one person - and Paulson lost it he was so panicked about something; so, as a former CEO of Goldman Sachs, he gambled for a miracle - the possible miracle that the Congress, press, public and Obama team would swallow the Section 8 chocker.
Note: TARP 1 was A ONE PAGE draft! To disburse a trillion dollars, maybe more???!!
Although Section 8 did not survive, not many reacted with the outrage that should have been heard. Despite that Section 8 hinted at things to come.
Exactly who and what was behind Section 8's attempted cover up? That answer might come out...or it might not. Instead it might be swept somewhere to be ignored as the short attention span of media and public drift elsewhere.
Now there is messy confusion about AIG bonuses, timing of same, why the taxpayer should be expected to pay the bonuses; but even more...why don't the banks, CEOs, traders and whoever else understand something is not right about receiving bonuses in a year when their companies went broke. Hmmmmm. So I have some questions,
(first, the broad context is the common sense view that a broke business enterprise should be helpless and in a position, by definition, of being totally vulnerable to renegotiate with creditors and contractual obligations):
1 Did Secretary Paulson know details about AIG's financial trouble last June 2008, uncluding bonus contracts, recipients, amoiunts?
2 At the very least, as a former investment house CEO (Goldman Sachs), wasn't Secretary Paulson knowledgable in principle about bonuses before Sept 8, TARP 1 (and Section 8); and wasn't he therefore able to conceptualize the detailed nature of collateral obligations carried by the relief targets?
3 Was Section 8, of TARP 1, designed to prevent Congressional due diligence inquiry and prevent Congressional examination of all future bailout funds?
4. What was particularly at threat by revealing details to be hidden by Section 8, and subsequently de facto hidden in Tarp 1?
5. Didn't Mr. Geitner, a former Wall Streeter, foresee in detail the landscape of all this - what institutions, their in-house contractual obligations, etc? His prior WStreet experience and expertise was the reason he was appointed Treasury Secretary.
6. By virtue of his WStreet experience, couldn't Mr. Geitner have anticipated problem issues that he then could have springboarded into prepared positions, drafts etc to be used by the Obama team as they cam into power?
7. Did Mr. Geitner discuss Section 8 with anyone? Why did Section 8 disappear after Tarp 1?
8. Did Mr. Geitner discuss with Mr. Paulson the transmittal by verbal or written means, Paulson-Bush administration agreements, understandings and obligations with Wall Street and the Federal Reserve?
9. Did Mr. Paulson consider, or have, informal discussions with Congressional committees regarding the information or insights he had about the crisis?
10. Finally, was/is Congress savvy enough to have anticipate the gist of Section 8? If so, why was there not an issue made right then?
The implications seem dire re the Paulson legacy: Section 8, the ghost of Section 8, the AIG bonus mess, the continuation of shields erected between the TARP targets and Congress and the Obama team..... Whatever is to come, you bet it will look like the AIG bonus mess.
Saturday, March 14, 2009
The Bailout, the Bankers Who Hustle and Con, ...and the Kid Geitner
Mr. Geitner's reticence in the face of bank bullying is a mystery. Just hope it is worth it for him, as the front man for the new administration, to keep taking it (ok, on the chin) from the bankers. It's like we've gone back to the era of big bucks and Taft.
The bank CEOs are colluding and bullying Mr. Geitner like he is a junior go-fer.
Mr. Geitner increasingly comes off as a fresh-faced kid. Where is Mr. Geitner's backbone, expertise and, supposed, professional insight in all this? One surely hopes he is holding some trump cards.
The banks are essentially kaput yet acting as if entitled to the bailouts. They continue to carve bonuses out of bailout finds as if nothing has happened. They apparently regard Mr. Geitner like a Carnie flattie drools when a curious mark comes to the booth. Sharks and minnows.
PS: The paying out of bonuses earlier than their normal payout date to make it appear the bonuses are acts prior to bailout, is transparent deception and should be treated as crimes. What is going on with Geitner, IRS, SEC, Obama ? Many web sites are questioning this, notably Huffingtonpost in their series,"
Tim Geithner, CNBC, and the Second Coming of Known Unknowns"
The bank CEOs are colluding and bullying Mr. Geitner like he is a junior go-fer.
Mr. Geitner increasingly comes off as a fresh-faced kid. Where is Mr. Geitner's backbone, expertise and, supposed, professional insight in all this? One surely hopes he is holding some trump cards.
The banks are essentially kaput yet acting as if entitled to the bailouts. They continue to carve bonuses out of bailout finds as if nothing has happened. They apparently regard Mr. Geitner like a Carnie flattie drools when a curious mark comes to the booth. Sharks and minnows.
PS: The paying out of bonuses earlier than their normal payout date to make it appear the bonuses are acts prior to bailout, is transparent deception and should be treated as crimes. What is going on with Geitner, IRS, SEC, Obama ? Many web sites are questioning this, notably Huffingtonpost in their series,"
Tim Geithner, CNBC, and the Second Coming of Known Unknowns"
Labels:
AIG,
bail out,
bailout,
bailout bonuses,
bank bailout,
CNBC,
Geitner,
Section 8,
Taft
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Hanging Ten on the Recession
This recession is like a ten mile high Tsunami suspended over the lands and most everyone are scurrying around pointing fingers and yelling at each other but only a few are bothering to look up.
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Still Undercover - What about, again, Tarp-1 Section 8? Hmmm Where's the Money?
Still haven't heard what happened to the first $350 Billion (otherwise known as a big lot of bucks).
Auto Bail Out, and a National Energy Plan
There seems to be something missing in the national dialog about the problems of American auto industry. The auto industry is in collapse, no question there. There is lots of public money going to bail it out, that has already begun so no doubts about that also. And it appears public money will continue to flow in that direction as the auto industry has kind of implied, mainly because it has not expressed any notion of a target timeline for ...what, exactly? This vagueness of objective other than "sometime somehow, we hope to be profitable", leaves the question standing there naked, just why is the public going to bail it out? What is the objective because other than getting the big three through each upcoming quarter, there does not appear to be measurable objectives along the way, nor conditions and purpose going along with the money.
A background thought: no other developed country has the same reluctance as the United States to guide a national industry resource when there is obviously a crisis right now. A personal explanation is that America is caught in trap of its own making, a quick sand of theological-economic ideology that holds sacred the preserving of a free-market icon. The truth is there is no such thing as a free market that obeys the axioms of theoretical market models. And the current Wall Street collapse, revealed after the previous administration's denials even up to the last second, has again scholed us on the real, human fallibility, vunerable to corruption, dynamics of our market system our mis-named market system. Exactly what is the appropriate name for our system, maybe junior-league facism? Hmmm, free-market, believe-me-when-I-tell-you, revivalist hokum?.
Why does America have such difficulty with the 'bail out' concept, when America has singled handedly bailed out, redirected, modernized, made over, and gifted the major global industrial giants (former fight-to-the-death enemies no less) with the Marshall Plan after WW2. Why does America have such a difficult time telling essentially bankrupted, bad product making, unimaginative and unadaptable auto company leadership its time to change in very basic ways.
A big problem, a missing puzzle piece, as I see it is that America needs a coherent, clearly objectified, National Energy Plan wherein the auto industry can have a clearly defined interdependent, and profiting, niche along side other major industries whose products use, produce, design, and integrate into the energy big picture. But again there seems to be an ideological block that prevents an even open dialog on that subject.
A background thought: no other developed country has the same reluctance as the United States to guide a national industry resource when there is obviously a crisis right now. A personal explanation is that America is caught in trap of its own making, a quick sand of theological-economic ideology that holds sacred the preserving of a free-market icon. The truth is there is no such thing as a free market that obeys the axioms of theoretical market models. And the current Wall Street collapse, revealed after the previous administration's denials even up to the last second, has again scholed us on the real, human fallibility, vunerable to corruption, dynamics of our market system our mis-named market system. Exactly what is the appropriate name for our system, maybe junior-league facism? Hmmm, free-market, believe-me-when-I-tell-you, revivalist hokum?.
Why does America have such difficulty with the 'bail out' concept, when America has singled handedly bailed out, redirected, modernized, made over, and gifted the major global industrial giants (former fight-to-the-death enemies no less) with the Marshall Plan after WW2. Why does America have such a difficult time telling essentially bankrupted, bad product making, unimaginative and unadaptable auto company leadership its time to change in very basic ways.
A big problem, a missing puzzle piece, as I see it is that America needs a coherent, clearly objectified, National Energy Plan wherein the auto industry can have a clearly defined interdependent, and profiting, niche along side other major industries whose products use, produce, design, and integrate into the energy big picture. But again there seems to be an ideological block that prevents an even open dialog on that subject.
Labels:
auto bail out,
auto industry,
bail out,
bailout,
energy,
National energy plan,
stimulus bill
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Recession, Let It Be
Perched Eye had a worrisome dream that it is too early to see how to fix this recession. So, unpleasant as it seems, would it be best to let things get worse until patterns and critical variables are clearer? Will money spent now actually work? Does government need to excercise a kind of national triage for the time being, maybe until unemployment reaches around 8.5%?
Nice compromise for Congress: Repubs won't have to spend money, Dems won't have to stick their necks out. Just have to accept a few million more job losses. Hmmmm?
Nice compromise for Congress: Repubs won't have to spend money, Dems won't have to stick their necks out. Just have to accept a few million more job losses. Hmmmm?
Labels:
bail out,
bailout,
job loss,
recession,
recovery plan,
unemployment
Friday, February 6, 2009
Recession, Bail Outs and Stimulus - "Remember Section 8"?
Section 8 of the TARP plan (the Troubled Asset Relief Program) was a troubling part of Treasury Secretary Paulson's early September 2008, $700+ Billion, Wall Street bailout plan. Section 8 read, “Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.” Section 8 exempted the administration (and specifically Paulson) from ANY and ALL oversight regarding his administrative actions in handing out $700 Billion of public money.
As the New York Times put it (NYT Sept 22, 2008, A.R. Sorkin), "with those words, the Treasury secretary...will be vested with perhaps the most incredible powers ever bestowed on one person over the economic and financial life of the nation."
Section 8 did not appear in the final bail, out but it didn't have to since it was de facto enacted on the first $350 billion dole-out about which no details yet have been offered, by whomsoever as to where, when and how those funds were distributed. But maybe worse, no one is effectively asking. It's like a predator picked off cows from the herd while the other cows just went on cud chewing. So, since section 8 continues in left over spirit like a bad odor, here're some thoughts about that from a Perched Eye.
Quick Glance:
Section 8 was unprecedented in American history. But the scam was unprecedented in scope. The Bush administration wanted a HAIL MARY bailout to save the day because the economy was about to tank but with a quick miracle, maybe GOP could save its rear or at least delay the collapse until after the election. Solution?- a midnight-hour, grandstand, outrageous play that relied on cowing the press, Democratic innocence (gullibility, naivete, etc) and a public that was only sporadically tuned in (apathetic). It almost worked.
Rose Glass:
The Bush administration was in truth caught unawares and was simply excercising (resorting to) a grosser version of executive privilege. 'Hey we have the best interests of (fill in good nice things);...just believe in us [and go back to your reality tv]."
The Gut (says):
The administration was passing bricks since early 08 trying to figure a spin on how to explain that Wall Street had done it again...despite the good guy faith the administration had placed in the eight year handshake with the financial sector, 'we trusted you guys....we're one of you...WTF..., and one more thing, don'hat you guys know when to stop, huh? Paulson, get out there; do your thing; we got one chance.... yeah, say anything...Congress are asleep at the wheel...tell em you don't need oversight. Don't worry, Pelosi and Reid haven't a clue where this thing has gone. Jeez, what would RN have done...sure he's not around?'
That basically sets the stage for everything that has happened from October 08 until now, February 6, 08. Think about it. GOP's still touting "wealth" as the only worthwhile passenger to be saved on this sinking ship, while the DEM's are still trying to mouth their position that the people deserve consideration too, and appear stunned that anyone in their right mind can forget this. Well, the GOP core can, could, and will continue quite well to forget the public (er, labor...lay em off... or something).
As the New York Times put it (NYT Sept 22, 2008, A.R. Sorkin), "with those words, the Treasury secretary...will be vested with perhaps the most incredible powers ever bestowed on one person over the economic and financial life of the nation."
Section 8 did not appear in the final bail, out but it didn't have to since it was de facto enacted on the first $350 billion dole-out about which no details yet have been offered, by whomsoever as to where, when and how those funds were distributed. But maybe worse, no one is effectively asking. It's like a predator picked off cows from the herd while the other cows just went on cud chewing. So, since section 8 continues in left over spirit like a bad odor, here're some thoughts about that from a Perched Eye.
Quick Glance:
Section 8 was unprecedented in American history. But the scam was unprecedented in scope. The Bush administration wanted a HAIL MARY bailout to save the day because the economy was about to tank but with a quick miracle, maybe GOP could save its rear or at least delay the collapse until after the election. Solution?- a midnight-hour, grandstand, outrageous play that relied on cowing the press, Democratic innocence (gullibility, naivete, etc) and a public that was only sporadically tuned in (apathetic). It almost worked.
Rose Glass:
The Bush administration was in truth caught unawares and was simply excercising (resorting to) a grosser version of executive privilege. 'Hey we have the best interests of (fill in good nice things);...just believe in us [and go back to your reality tv]."
The Gut (says):
The administration was passing bricks since early 08 trying to figure a spin on how to explain that Wall Street had done it again...despite the good guy faith the administration had placed in the eight year handshake with the financial sector, 'we trusted you guys....we're one of you...WTF..., and one more thing, don'hat you guys know when to stop, huh? Paulson, get out there; do your thing; we got one chance.... yeah, say anything...Congress are asleep at the wheel...tell em you don't need oversight. Don't worry, Pelosi and Reid haven't a clue where this thing has gone. Jeez, what would RN have done...sure he's not around?'
That basically sets the stage for everything that has happened from October 08 until now, February 6, 08. Think about it. GOP's still touting "wealth" as the only worthwhile passenger to be saved on this sinking ship, while the DEM's are still trying to mouth their position that the people deserve consideration too, and appear stunned that anyone in their right mind can forget this. Well, the GOP core can, could, and will continue quite well to forget the public (er, labor...lay em off... or something).
Labels:
bailout,
Congress,
Congressional oversight,
Paulson,
recession,
Section 8,
stimulus,
TARP,
Wall Street
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)