The Perched Eye blog is 15 years old, ...it was created in 2009 after President Obama's election. Our focus has been eclectic ... the styles and directions of American politics and culture, with an occasional comment on the impact of new technologies. Our observations sometimes attract a critical eye, but the 'pen' remains unblunted.
-------
Personally, I am going to stop critiquing Georgia's Fulton County DA, Fanni Willis's choice to, mid-case, take up with her consultant-co prosector team member, Mr Nathan Wade, and give thanks that she is still on the case.
BUT, AS A LAST PERSONAL ADVISEMENT, FANNI WILLIS EARNED A LOW GRADE FROM ME BY TAKING UP WITH WADE MID-CASE... thus allowing the Defense to inflate/falsely construct a hint of conflict-of-interest.
BUT NOTE: the Defendant team also has an attorney 'couple'. The difference is how it 'LOOKS' to the public eye. (The defense team's couple is a humanizing, public relations 'plus.')
'Looks', though not illegal, should always be a significant factor to an experienced legal jurist ...like Willis. who took her eye 'off the ball' for personal emotion.
IMO, also, the judge's 'decision' has more the LOOK of a personal comment more in line with a rural county judge. Nevertheless, the judge did the prosecution a favor by settling the 'Looks' question.
Willis' choice between remaining on the case or taking up with her employee, Co-Prosecutor Wade, was the professional woman's option (with 'normal' consequences/risks.) Willis' slip was not a womens' rights thing..because a male prosecutor would face even stronger handling by an attentive press who could paint a picture of sexual bribery. (It all depends on POV.)
No comments:
Post a Comment